Vol 5 No 2 (2020): October
Articles

"I can rise up from my adversity”: Situational language learning strategies


Febti Ismiatun
Universitas Islam Malang, Indonesia
Bio
Diah Retno Widowati
Universitas Islam Malang, Indonesia
Bio
Eko Suhartoyo
Universitas Islam Malang, Indonesia
Bio
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published September 16, 2020
Keywords
  • situational approach,
  • students' strategies,
  • language learning
How to Cite
Ismiatun, F., Widowati, D. R., & Suhartoyo, E. (2020). "I can rise up from my adversity”: Situational language learning strategies . JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 5(2), 143-147. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v5i2.512

Abstract

Deriving from the postulation that learning strategies are shaped from a learning situation, which is inseparable from its socio-cultural context. A paradigm has shifted language learning strategies (LLSs) studies in the new perspective of situational-based research. Using a narrative approach, this study examined one female pre-service teacher of an English education major in occupying strategies to fulfill the learning needs. To meet with the data, semi-structured interviews were carried out for the participant through a series of interconnected questions. The results marked that the use of learning strategies varied in a distinct learning situation, including the strategies to achieve the learning goal as well as to encounter the obstacles in English learning. Thus, this study has emphasized the feasibility of LLSs in context. Suggestions were also presented at the end of this paper.

HIGHLIGHTS:

  • The use of strategies is varied in changing learning situation.
  • The appropriate strategies assist students in fulfilling the English learning needs.
  • The application of strategy training in EFL classroom is noteworthy because it is teachable.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Pazooki, I., Hakhverdian, A., Moghadam, M. Y., & Daraei, R.. (2018). The Effect of Developing Test-Wiseness on Iranian Efl Learners’listening Comprehension And Test Anxiety. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Scientific Research, 1(9), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.31426/ijamsr.2018.1.9.912
  2. Amiryousefi, M. (2016). The differential effects of two types of task repetition on the complexity, accuracy, and fluency in computer-mediated L2 written production: a focus on computer anxiety. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(5), 1050–1066. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1170040
  3. Azkarai, A., & García Mayo, M. del P. (2017). Task repetition effects on L1 use in EFL child task-based interaction. Language Teaching Research, 21(4), 480–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816654169
  4. Bai, B., & Guo, W. (2019). Motivation and self-regulated strategy use: Relationships to primary school students’ English writing in Hong Kong. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819859921
  5. Chon, Y. V., & Shin, T. (2019). Profile of second language learners’ metacognitive awareness and academic motivation for successful listening: A latent class analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 70, 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.01.007
  6. Clark, A., & Lappin, S. (2013). Complexity in Language Acquisition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12001
  7. Comajoan, L. (2019). Cognitive grammar learning strategies in the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology in L3 Catalan. Language Acquisition, 26(3), 262–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2018.1534965
  8. Coskun, A. (2010). The Effect of Metacognitive Strategy Training on the Listening Performance of Beginner Students. Online Submission, 4(1), 35-50.
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Five Qualitative Approaches to Inquiry. In Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (pp. 65–110). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  10. Dawson, C., & Dawson, C. (2019). Strategies for Learning and Structuring. In Effective Learning. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087908706_005
  11. Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Attitudes, Orientations, and Motivations in Language Learning: Advances in Theory, Research, and Applications. Language Learning, 53(S1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.53222
  12. Fekri, N. (2016). Investigating the Effect of Cooperative Learning and Competitive Learning Strategies on the English Vocabulary Development of Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 9(11), 6. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n11p6
  13. Ferdinand, V., Kirby, S., & Smith, K. (2019). The cognitive roots of regularization in language. Cognition, 184, 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.12.002
  14. Griffiths, C. (2003). Patterns of language learning strategy use. System, 31(3), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00048-4
  15. Griffiths, C. (2015). What have we learnt from “good language learners”? ELT Journal, 69(4), 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv040
  16. Gu, Y. (2012). Learning strategies: Prototypical core and dimensions of variation. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 3(4), 330–356. http://sisaljournal.org/archives/dec12/gu
  17. Hakan, K., Aydin, B., & Bulent, A. (2015). An Investigation of Undergraduates’ Language Learning Strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1348–1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.388
  18. Han, T. (2015). Foreign Language Learning Strategies in the Context of STEM Education. GiST Education and Learning Research Journal, 11, 79–102. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.287
  19. Huang, S. C. (2018). Language learning strategies in context. Language Learning Journal, 46(5), 647–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1186723
  20. Kusey, C. (2010). Lessons from Good Language Learners , edited by Carol Griffiths. Bilingual Research Journal, 33(2), 267–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2010.502804
  21. Leaver, B. Lou, Ehrman, M., & Shekhtman, B. (2009). Learning styles and learning strategies. In Achieving Success in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 65–91). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511610431.005
  22. Mistar, J., Zuhairi, A., & Yanti, N. (2016). Strategies Training in the Teaching of Reading Comprehension for EFL Learners in Indonesia. English Language Teaching, 9(2), 49. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n2p49
  23. Movahed, R. (2014). The Effect of Metacognitive Strategy Instruction on Listening Performance, Metaconitive awareness and Listening anxiety of Beginner Iranian EFL Students. International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v4n2p88
  24. Neuenhaus, N., Artelt, C., Schneider, W., & Lingel, K. (2018). Does metacognitive knowledge mediate the relation between goal orientations and educational achievement in secondary school students? Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 16(44), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v16i44.1935
  25. Nguyen, L. T. C., & Gu, Y. (2013). Strategy-based instruction: A learner-focused approach to developing learner autonomy. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168812457528
  26. Oxford, R. L. (1992). Research on Second Language Learning Strategies. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190500002452
  27. Qian, Y., & Sun, Y. (2019). Autonomous learning of productive vocabulary in the EFL context: An action research approach. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 34(1), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqy026
  28. Rahimi, A. H. (2012). On the Role of Strategy Use and Strategy Instruction in Listening Comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.3.550-559
  29. Révész, A., Kourtali, N. E., & Mazgutova, D. (2017). Effects of Task Complexity on L2 Writing Behaviors and Linguistic Complexity. Language Learning, 67(1), 208–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12205
  30. Robinson, S. A., Rickenbach, E. H., & Lachman, M. E. (2016). Self-regulatory strategies in daily life. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025415592187
  31. Rose, H. (2012). Reconceptualizing strategic learning in the face of self-regulation: Throwing language learning strategies out with the bathwater. Applied Linguistics, 33(1), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr045
  32. Rubin, J. (1975). What the “Good Language Learner” Can Teach Us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586011
  33. Teng, (Mark) Feng. (2019). The role of metacognitive knowledge and regulation in mediating university EFL learners’ writing performance. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1615493
  34. Teng, L. S., & Zhang, L. J. (2019). Empowering learners in the second/foreign language classroom: Can self-regulated learning strategies-based writing instruction make a difference? Journal of Second Language Writing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100701
  35. Vandergrift, L. (2005). Relationships among motivation orientations, metacognitive awareness and proficiency in L2 listening. Applied Linguistics, 26(1), 70–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amh039
  36. Wahyudi, R. (2014). What Does Good Language Learner (GLL) Say about Foreign Language Learning? A Story from an Indonesian Learner. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.5n.1p.1
  37. Weston, J. L. (2015). The Impact of Strategy Instruction on Source-Based Writing. In ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1716382312?accountid=14244%5Cnhttp://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolution.com?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/ProQuest+Dissertations+%26+Theses+Global&rft
  38. Yang, C., & Bai, L. (2019). The use of metacognitive strategies by Chinese PhD students of social sciences in Australian universities. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.06.007