- English phoneme,
- phonemic awareness,
- phoneme identification skill,
- word processing,
- EFL learners
Copyright (c) 2020 Miftakh Farid Rokhman, Alies Poetri Lintangsari, Widya Caterine Perdhani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This research aims to find out the correlation between English phoneme identification skills and word processing. It applies the quantitative approach with correlation design. The participants are 100 of 3rd- semester students in English Language Education Program. The correlational result reveals that it has correlation with .382 degrees in phoneme identification skill toward blending skill with the significance level .000, and .359 degrees in phoneme identification skill toward segmentation skill with the significance level .000. Then, the correlation result of English phoneme identification skill toward word processing is .462 degree with its significance .000. By the result, awareness to identify phoneme by initial, medial, and final sound correlates to the blending and segmenting skills which influence the comprehension of word. The more the students are able to identify phoneme based on its sound, the more the students will be able to blend and segment phoneme. Lastly, the ability to identify English phonemes is proven to be a skill that supports EFL learners on their productive and receptive skills. Then being able to identify its phonemes will assist on recognizing and processing English words appropriately so that English language teaching can be associated with the use of phoneme-based instruction on its teaching process.
- Ability to identify English phonemes is proven to be a skill that supports EFL learners on their English productive and receptive skills.
- English phoneme identification skill contributes to blending and segmentation skill since phonemic awareness provides both decoding and encoding skill.
- Alhumsi, M. H. and Affendi, A. (2016). The Relationship between Phonemic Seg- mentation Skill and EFL Word Recognition - A Review of Literature. Interna- tional Journal of Linguistics 8, 31–31. doi: 10.5296/ijl.v8i2.9097.
- Burgoyne, K., Duff, F., Snowling, M., Buckley, S., and Hulme, C. (2013). Train- ing phoneme blending skills in children with Down syndrome. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 29, 273–290. doi: 10.1177/0265659012474674.
- Collins, B., & Mees, I. M. (2013). Practical phonetics and phonology: A resource book for students. Routledge.
- Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating qualitative and quantitative approach (Boston: Pearson).
- Darcy, I., Park, H., and Yang, C.-L. (2015). Individual differences in L2 acquisition of English phonology: The relation between cognitive abilities and phonological processing. Learning and Individual Differences 40, 63–72. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif. 2015.04.005.
- de Graaff, S., Hasselman, F., Verhoeven, L., and Bosman, A. M. (2011). Phone- mic awareness in Dutch kindergartners: Effects of task, phoneme position, and phoneme class. Learning and Instruction 21, 163–173. doi: 10.1016/j. learninstruc.2010.02.001.
- Dixon, L. Q. (2011). Singaporean kindergartners’ phonological awareness and English writing skills. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 32, 98–108. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2011.02.008.
- Frost, J. (2001). Phonemic awareness, spontaneous writing, and reading and spelling development from a preventive perspective. Reading and Writing 14, 487–513.
- Gozali, I. (2019). Developing Phonics Material to Improve the Spoken English of Indonesian Tertiary Students. KnE Social Sciences 3, 379–379. doi: 10.18502/kss. v3i10.3920.
- Haft, S. L., Caballero, J. N., Tanaka, H., Zekelman, L., Cutting, L. E., Uchikoshi, Y., et al. (2019). Direct and indirect contributions of executive function to word decoding and reading comprehension in kindergarten. Learning and Individual Differences 76, 101783–101783. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101783.
- Heggerty, M. (2017). Phonemic awareness: The skills that they need to help them succeed.
- Hismanoglu, M. (2012). An investigation of phonological awareness of prospec- tive EFL teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 31, 639–645. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.117.
- Kalia, V., Lane, P. D., and Wilbourn, M. P. (2018). Cognitive control and phono- logical awareness in the acquisition of second language vocabulary within the Spanish-English dual immersion context. Cognitive Development 48, 176–189. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.08.010.
- Kasim, U., Raisha, and Siti (2017). Kasim, U., & Raisha, S. (2017). EFL students’ reading comprehension problems: Linguistic and non-linguistic complexities. Efl students’ reading comprehension problems:linguistic and non-linguistic com- plexities 8.
- Lee, K. and Man (2011). Relative Contributions of Phonological Awareness and Orthographic Knowledge to the Reading Proficiency of Chinese Students Learn- ing English as a Foreign Language.
- Pohlman, C. (2013). https://sites.google.com/a/gaston.k12.nc.us/cjpohlmanweb/ about-learning-to-read/comprehension-phonemic-awareness.
- Sawyer, D. J. and Fox, B. J. (1991). pdf%5Cnhttp://books.google.co.uk/books?id= Yy20mAEACAAJ.
- Terry, B. (2019). https://scholarwithin.com/reading-spelling-decoding-encoding. Venkatagiri, H. S. and Levis, J. M. (2009). Venkatagiri, H. S., & Levis, J. M. (2007).
- Phonological awareness and speech comprehensibility: An exploratory study. Language awareness. Phonological awareness and speech comprehensibility: An exploratory study 16.
- Yurianto, L. (2019). Indonesian EFL Learners’ English Phonemic Awareness. Undergraduate Thesis. Faculty of Cultural Studies, English Language Education Program, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang.
- Zellou, G. and Dahan, D. (2019). Listeners maintain phonological uncertainty over time and across words: The case of vowel nasality in English. Journal of Phonetics 76, 100910–100910. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2019.06.001.
- Zhao, J., Joshi, R. M., Dixon, L. Q., and Chen, S. (2017). Contribution of phono- logical, morphological and orthographic awareness to English word spelling: A comparison of EL1 and EFL models. Contemporary Educational Psychology 49, 185–194. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.01.007.